This website was last updated: Friday May 24th 2019
Worldwide 2004 - 2019
SenSlip* Artificial Foreskin - Viafin-Atlas Ltd.
Please share this page with your friends.
SenSlip* ..... is a'Registered Trademark'
Study Confirms Circumcision is Genital Mutilation
A new study in the British Journal of Urology (International) shows that men with normal, intact penises enjoy more sexual sensitivity - as much as four times more than those who have had an average circumcision. Circumcising slices off more of a male's sensitivity than is normally present in all ten fingertips.
In every site tested, intact men have as much or more fine touch skin sensitivity on their penis and foreskin than a man who had an average circumcision. Circumcision removes the most sensitive portions of the penis.
This new study (July 2013) demonstrates we have suspected for decades, that circumcision's result - if not it's intent - is reduced sexual pleasure for men. As such, it is a violation of male's right to bodily integrity. In part, female circumcision (FGM) does the same. Even the mildest forms remove the most sensitive portions of the female genitalia. Females in the USA and many other countries are protected by law from all forms of genital cutting.
Because circumcision and the associated risks of the procedure have such a drastic effect on sexuality later in life, no infant or child should ever experience a non-therapeutic circumcision.
Parents should not be allowed to control their son's level of sexual sensitivity because of a personal bias or prejudice, just as no parent should be allowed to request for their son or daughter for any other sensitivity reducing surgery: For example: eye surgery that would limit the vision to black and white.
Adult men who want circumcision for themselves, should be advised by proper informed consent that penile sensitivity will be reduced on average by a factor of four. Men should also be advised that circumcision will not prevent the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. , including HIV/AIDS.
See What The British Journal of Urology has to say further down the page...
"Circumcision of Infants Is A Multi Million Dollar/Euro Industry"
"Men Getting Cut"
Genital cutting of infants has been going on for ages, and for different reasons. The two men on the right look like they wanted to have their penises cut, but babies and infants do not know what is going on, so they have no say in the matter. There have been many excuses and reasons for cutting genitalia of non-consenting males: In the 'olden' days it cured all sorts of things including, madness, laziness, masturbation, blindness, hyper activity and more. Today the 'Circumcising Experts' justify cutting male genitalia because it can make you live longer and become more resilient to catching horrible diseases. Circumcising also makes a lot of money. It's a multi million dollar/euro industry. There is always a reason for the circumcisers to circumcise. Next year there will be a new reason. In Europe 97% of the male population have a foreskin and do not want to part with it.
Circumcision is a permanent procedure which sexually reduces the individual's right to a normal functioning penis. The short and long term consequences of circumcision are now becoming well documented. They vary relative to the severity of the procedure. The short term consequences include: severe pain, shock, haemorrhage, infection, excessive penile skin loss, skin bridges, glans deformation or loss of penis. In some cases - death !
The long term consequences of circumcision include: keratinisation, sexual dysfunction, loss of sexual sensitivity and increased friction and pain during sexual activity. There do not appear to be any benefits whatsoever. This is why the vast majority of the world's adult male population are not circumcised and have no desire to be circumcised.
Circumcision can leave a lifetime scar on the mind and body of the man who underwent the knife, especially, if he did not consent to it. In the longer term, circumcised men can and often do, suffer from feelings of anger, resentment, mutilation, depression, post traumatic stress disorder and suicide. Life long psychological trauma is common.
(Viafin-Atlas Ltd. Data Base).
Excision or injury, to part of, or all of the skin and specialised mucosal tissues of the penis, including (in the majority of cases) the removal of the foreskin, frenulum and penile shaft tissue.
Any procedure which interferes permanently with the penile skin structure and normal function of the penis. The most 'acceptable' type of circumcision in the modern world is the removal of the foreskin, penile shaft skin and the frenulum. These penis parts are the most sexually responsive tissue parts on the penis, and they account for the majority of circumcisions.
Circumcision of non consenting infants who undergo genital cutting for no medical reason, is often referred to as - Male Genital Mutilation. Today, male circumcision includes just about any procedure which involves cutting away external parts of the male genitalia. In most cases it is carried out for non-medical reasons on those who are unable to have any say in the matter - babies and infants. All the while, day after day, real little boys with real names, real lives, real futures, continue to be subjected to needless suffering, illness, lifelong mental and physical scarring and the risk of serious medical complications all the way up to death. Surely this has to change. circumcision is big business, for the doctors, hospitals, circumcisers and manufacturers of circumcision equipment. Amputated baby foreskins have become a valuable trading commodity for the middle men working with the cosmetic industry
There are different kinds of male circumcision or male genital mutilation carried out worldwide. Circumcision has not been medically or legally defined, and can vary from having a piece of the foreskin removed, the entire penis skin structure removed, to having the frenulum & glans removed. In several cases the penis has been amputated. In many others, death has resulted. These are undeniable facts, which seem to be generally ignored:
Each year in the USA, Canada, United Kingdom, Europe and elsewhere, neonates and infants die because of someone else's wishes for them to have a 'Non-Medical Circumcision'. Several hundred babies a year due to circumcision. Many more have been sexually crippled. Society generally accepts this. Is neo-natal and infant circumcision for non-medical reasons, right or wrong?
Viafin-Atlas & SenSlip Artificial Foreskin © 2004 - 2019 All Rights Reserved - Say NO to circumcision